Philosophical thoughts on Politics after the Truth

Abstract

This paper explores the philosophical implications of politics in the so-called "post-truth" era, where emotional appeals, ideological narratives, and misinformation often overshadow objective facts and rational discourse. Drawing on the works of philosophers such as Hannah Arendt, Michel Foucault, and Jürgen Habermas, the study interrogates the shifting role of truth in public life and its impact on democratic institutions. It examines how the erosion of trust in traditional sources of knowledge—such as science, journalism, and academia—has led to a reconfiguration of political authority and legitimacy. The analysis also engages with contemporary debates on epistemic relativism, the manipulation of language, and the rise of populism. Ultimately, the paper argues that the crisis of truth is not merely a symptom of political decay but a profound philosophical challenge that necessitates a rethinking of ethics, power, and civic responsibility in modern governance. By situating "truth" as both a philosophical and political problem, the work invites renewed reflection on how societies might reclaim integrity in public discourse without reverting to absolutism or censorship.